Comments
Sort by recent activity
when I read more I found that this is missing in current version 3.1. So my question will be will I have a free upgrade when this feature is released? Otherwise I might consider return the purchase and wait for the new feature since this is often used feature for me.
Thanks! / comments
when I read more I found that this is missing in current version 3.1. So my question will be will I have a free upgrade when this feature is released? Otherwise I might consider return the purchase...
ah. I just purchased version 3, will this feature free update? or I have to pay to upgrade? / comments
ah. I just purchased version 3, will this feature free update? or I have to pay to upgrade?
waiting the hotkey too! and the ability only cache selective databases. / comments
waiting the hotkey too! and the ability only cache selective databases.
I have exactly same annoyance...
rgribble wrote:
Ive installed the 3.5RC and am happy to see the cross database working well for the most part. Im also happ ythat it supports Database..Table notation as well as Database.dbo.Table, as requested [image]
However i do get a little annoyance here, as i like to have my candidate list pop up very quickly (currenty 50ms), and i also like "." to be a completion character. Thus when i try to do Database..Table, i usually end up with Database.<some user starting with "a">.Table. Would there be any way to have an option to add a single "." to the candidate list when listing roles/schemas/users? Or even an option to make dbo be the default (rather than selecting the first user alphabetically)?
To get around this ive stopped using . as a completion char, but this makes it different to visual studio intellisense and its hard to get used to!
/ comments
I have exactly same annoyance...
rgribble wrote:
Ive installed the 3.5RC and am happy to see the cross database working well for the most part. Im also happ ythat it supports Database..Table nota...
Bart Read wrote:
Hi there,
No problem. We're supporting both cross-database queries and linked SQL Server instances in 3.5. I'm hoping we can get an early access release out by the end of the month, but no promises I'm afraid.
Hope that helps.
Thanks,
Bart
Any update? The cross-database will be great!! / comments
Bart Read wrote:
Hi there,
No problem. We're supporting both cross-database queries and linked SQL Server instances in 3.5. I'm hoping we can get an early access release out by the end of the mo...