Comments
Sort by recent activity
Thanks Brian,
and as you might have noticed in my reply to your answer regarding the bug - this is between two SQL server 2000 servers...
Joakim / comments
Thanks Brian,
and as you might have noticed in my reply to your answer regarding the bug - this is between two SQL server 2000 servers...
Joakim
Thanks Brian,
but it actually is a comparison between two SQL Server 2000 servers.
Joakim / comments
Thanks Brian,
but it actually is a comparison between two SQL Server 2000 servers.
Joakim
>Are you positive that the server isn't really a SQL 2005 running a database in SQL Server 2000 (80) compatibility mode?
Yes sir 8) .
Unless one of my colleagues have done rogue installations secretely at night... performing dark rites... laying out pentagrams of TP cable, sacrificing Microsoft Mice and old Pentiums while invoking the archangel Linux etc...
No, I am positive, no SQL 2005 on any of our production servers yet, and they all show this symptom.
Joakim / comments
>Are you positive that the server isn't really a SQL 2005 running a database in SQL Server 2000 (80) compatibility mode?
Yes sir 8) .
Unless one of my colleagues have done rogue installations secr...