Comments
Sort by recent activity
That question will not get answered in a public forum, because the answer is unfavorable. / comments
That question will not get answered in a public forum, because the answer is unfavorable.
I don't want to run the SmartAssembly application on a PI, but rather I want to obfuscate .NET Core assemblies that can run on a PI. / comments
I don't want to run the SmartAssembly application on a PI, but rather I want to obfuscate .NET Core assemblies that can run on a PI.
That might work to a point, but it would not allow us to verify that our SmartAssembly configurations are valid with new software changes. I was hoping for a command line parameter which would compile the SAPROJ for verification without storing anything into the database. Frankly, that sounds like it might be a pretty handy feature. / comments
That might work to a point, but it would not allow us to verify that our SmartAssembly configurations are valid with new software changes. I was hoping for a command line parameter which would com...
I realize this is an older question, but is the status unchanged? Is there now (2021) a way to obfuscate public members by default with the possibility to not obfuscate items when needed? / comments
I realize this is an older question, but is the status unchanged? Is there now (2021) a way to obfuscate public members by default with the possibility to not obfuscate items when needed?