Activity overview
Latest activity by kevinsalot
I think you've misunderstood. The issue isn't SQL 2012 related.
Our organization wants to upgrade to a new version of SQL Compare because we want to use SQL 2012 (instead of 2008R2).
On version 8, SQL Compare works with numbered SPs. After the upgrade, it does not. As you can see in the ticket, this is acknowledged as a defect in the product. it was broken sometime in version 8.2:
"Unfortunately this is a known bug with versions 8.2 and higher. The reference is SC-4638."
Support had me try the beta for SQL Compare 11, and at least in my testing the defect was fixed. / comments
I think you've misunderstood. The issue isn't SQL 2012 related.
Our organization wants to upgrade to a new version of SQL Compare because we want to use SQL 2012 (instead of 2008R2).
On version 8, ...
I found a similar post with what seems to be the same issue. http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ... t=numbered
This was working for me in SQL Compare 8. We purchased SQL Compare 10 in order to get support for SQL Server 2012. Since the upgrade we have had unreliable comparisons for our SPs. / comments
I found a similar post with what seems to be the same issue.http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ... t=numbered
This was working for me in SQL Compare 8. We purchased SQL Compare 10 in order to ...
I too am having this issue.
This was working for me in SQL Compare 8. We purchased SQL Compare 10 in order to get support for SQL Server 2012. Since the upgrade we have had unreliable comparisons for our SPs.
Has RedGate acknowledged this as a defect that will be corrected in an update? Does anyone know a workaround for this?
Thanks! / comments
I too am having this issue.
This was working for me in SQL Compare 8. We purchased SQL Compare 10 in order to get support for SQL Server 2012. Since the upgrade we have had unreliable comparisons f...