Activity overview
Latest activity by philb1212
I'm unable to provide the project for IP reasons, but I tested with SmartAssembly's PDB generation off, and the stack trace is the same but without line numbers, which makes sense really.
I'm guessing you could repro this by trying to create an instance of a class that throws an exception inside a method called by its constructor. That is, have some code create an instance of ClassA whose c'tor calls some method on ClassA, which throws an exception in that method. / comments
I'm unable to provide the project for IP reasons, but I tested with SmartAssembly's PDB generation off, and the stack trace is the same but without line numbers, which makes sense really.
I'm guess...
The actual line number is 764, which is correctly reported in the stack trace in the original, unobfuscated build. It happens to be an exception that is thrown inside a method called from a constructor, in case that rings any bells. Another matter that may be of interest is that the frame where the c'tor is called isn't included in the stack trace at all except when the debugger is attached.
I'll see what happens with SmartAssembly's PDB generation turned off. / comments
The actual line number is 764, which is correctly reported in the stack trace in the original, unobfuscated build. It happens to be an exception that is thrown inside a method called from a constru...
Wrong line numbers in stack traces
We just purchased SmartAssembly and it's performing well. However, we noticed an issue where a source line number is wrong in stack traces. An example is below. It reports a line number is 16777215...