Activity overview
Latest activity by bdw429s
Wow, I just noticed that a brand new minor release (3.1.2) just came out today. All the site says is "several major bug fixes". Does anyone know specifically what it fixes?
~Brad / comments
Wow, I just noticed that a brand new minor release (3.1.2) just came out today. All the site says is "several major bug fixes". Does anyone know specifically what it fixes?
~Brad
My team has updated. We had some weird locking errors when only half the team was on the new version and the other half was on the old version. A restart of SQL seemed to fix it, so it may have just been a gremlin.
Since then, I haven't noticed the timeout errors at all. I E-mailed my team to see if anyone else has seen the timeouts since upgrading. From what I can tell, it's stable.
Thanks RedGate! / comments
My team has updated. We had some weird locking errors when only half the team was on the new version and the other half was on the old version. A restart of SQL seemed to fix it, so it may have j...
My team of 9 has been experiencing the same issue for a while now. I finally got around to googling today and I'm glad I found this thread. I'm commenting mostly to subscribe so I will be sure to know when the update is out. I hope the update is soon-- the usability of SSC has been greatly impacted by this repeated error. / comments
My team of 9 has been experiencing the same issue for a while now. I finally got around to googling today and I'm glad I found this thread. I'm commenting mostly to subscribe so I will be sure to...
Thanks for the reply. I figured out what happened. I checked for updates and installed the latest version, but I didn't realize that the new version didn't replace the old executable, but instead created a new shortcut in my start menu. I had a short cut that I always use in my quick launch bar to run SQL Data Compare. I didn't even notice that I was still running the old version.
Now, that being said, is there a reason why the old version is left on my PC? When I upgrade software, I kind of expect that to be the only version installed.
No worries on the delay replying. / comments
Thanks for the reply. I figured out what happened. I checked for updates and installed the latest version, but I didn't realize that the new version didn't replace the old executable, but instead...
Thanks for the reply, David.
I'm on SQL Data Compare 9.1.0.365. I do have SQL Source Control (3.0.13.4212) installed on the same machine.
I checked for updates on all three prior to posting.
P.S. This is the Brad Wood who was E-mailing you last week about Jenkins integration with SQL Source Control. [image] / comments
Thanks for the reply, David.
I'm on SQL Data Compare 9.1.0.365. I do have SQL Source Control (3.0.13.4212) installed on the same machine.
I checked for updates on all three prior to posting.
P.S. ...
Bueller? / comments
Bueller?
Hmm, it looks like images are broken. Unless I'm just not doing something right, we should remove the image button since it apparently doesn't work.
I also wanted to mention that I updated both schema compare and data compare to the latest version before posting here. / comments
Hmm, it looks like images are broken. Unless I'm just not doing something right, we should remove the image button since it apparently doesn't work.
I also wanted to mention that I updated both sc...
How do I migrate data direct from source control
I have Googled and searched the forums and have been unable to find an answer to this question. Please let me know if the question belongs in the SQL Data Compare forum.
When performing a SQL sche...
If you want this feature, please go vote here: http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/390 ... static-tab / comments
If you want this feature, please go vote here:http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/390 ... static-tab
Interesting. Is that because the migration script is tied to the specific revision numbers that is goes between and when you merge and commit between branches, your changes are committed with new revision numbers?
I'm pretty certain some version systems store information about what revisions were merged and committed, but that would probably be unreliable for every source control system.
What are your plans for finding a way to tie the migration script to the appropriate revisions that will still work across a merge? / comments
Interesting. Is that because the migration script is tied to the specific revision numbers that is goes between and when you merge and commit between branches, your changes are committed with new ...