How can we help you today? How can we help you today?
DanielRose
Activity overview Badges (0) Posts (4) Comments (16)

Comments

Sort by recent activity
Reflector disassembles managed code (CLI). It doesn't work for unmanaged C or C++ code. / comments
  1. Community
  2. .Net Reflector 6.x and .NET Reflector 6.x Pro
  3. module does not contain a CLI header
Reflector disassembles managed code (CLI). It doesn't work for unmanaged C or C++ code.
0 votes
Hi Alex, I put the resources assembly (with stripped strong-name) in the target location of the build, but it didn't change anything (still the same error). / comments
  1. Community
  2. .Net Reflector 6.x and .NET Reflector 6.x Pro
  3. Build 451 - Reference with satellite assembly not working
Hi Alex, I put the resources assembly (with stripped strong-name) in the target location of the build, but it didn't change anything (still the same error).
0 votes
Hi Alex, Thanks for the quick reply. My referenced Dll is in the GAC, so at least the hint path is not necessary. Also, with the new hint path being a relative path, it is dependent on the file structure on the machine, which could be different on another developer's machine. / comments
  1. Community
  2. .Net Reflector 6.x and .NET Reflector 6.x Pro
  3. Build 451 - References changed in project file
Hi Alex, Thanks for the quick reply. My referenced Dll is in the GAC, so at least the hint path is not necessary. Also, with the new hint path being a relative path, it is dependent on the file str...
0 votes
With Windows 10 and .NET 4.6 being out, a small update for SmartAssembly to correctly recognize them in feature usage reporting would be nice [image] / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. .NET 4.6 Support
With Windows 10 and .NET 4.6 being out, a small update for SmartAssembly to correctly recognize them in feature usage reporting would be nice
0 votes
IIRC I had that bug when I used a SQL-server on a different machine, with the address given as \serverSQLExpress Instead, the address needs to be serverSQLExpress I.e. without the starting \. Since smartassembly is crashing on startup, you'll need to manually change it in the settings file in C:ProgramDataRed GateSmartAssembly. / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. Cannot Start SmartAssembly
IIRC I had that bug when I used a SQL-server on a different machine, with the address given as \serverSQLExpress Instead, the address needs to be serverSQLExpress I.e. without the starting \. Sin...
0 votes
nyxling wrote: IF NOT EXIST "0001_Obfuscate" ( mkdir "0001_Obfuscate" ) IF EXIST "0001_Obfuscate\Assembly-CSharp.dll" ( del "0001_Obfuscate\Assembly-CSharp.dll" ) "C:\Program Files\Red Gate\SmartAssembly 6\SmartAssembly.com" /build "%system.teamcity.build.checkoutDir%/../0001.saproj" IF EXIST "0001_Obfuscate\Assembly-CSharp.dll" ( copy "0001_Obfuscate\Assembly-CSharp.dll" "0001_Build\0001_Data\Managed\Assembly-CSharp.dll" ) AFAIK the copy command sets the errorlevel as well. So if the SA build fails, but the file was created, it gets copied. If copying succeeded, this will return 0. So the correction would be: "C:\Program Files\Red Gate\SmartAssembly 6\SmartAssembly.com" /build "%system.teamcity.build.checkoutDir%/../0001.saproj" IF ERRORLEVEL 1 EXIT 1 IF EXIST "0001_Obfuscate\Assembly-CSharp.dll" ( copy "0001_Obfuscate\Assembly-CSharp.dll" "0001_Build\0001_Data\Managed\Assembly-CSharp.dll" ) / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. Sometimes SA doesn't give error return codes
nyxling wrote: IF NOT EXIST "0001_Obfuscate" ( mkdir "0001_Obfuscate" ) IF EXIST "0001_Obfuscate\Assembly-CSharp.dll" ( del "0001_Obfuscate\Assembly-CSharp.dll" ) "C:\Program Fi...
0 votes
I have over 42000 samap files, of which I only need a couple hundred. With that amount of files, any manual search and delete won't work in any reasonable amount of time. So please add me to the list of people who could really use such a tool! / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. Cleanup samap files
I have over 42000 samap files, of which I only need a couple hundred. With that amount of files, any manual search and delete won't work in any reasonable amount of time. So please add me to the li...
0 votes
I encountered the same problem. I upgraded from .NET 4.0 to .NET 4.5.2. Even with the MandatoryPath set, I can't get it to work. The reason is that some assembly is referring to .NET 2.0: 2014-10-16 16:09:02,642 DEBUG SmartAssembly.AssemblyReader: Resolved assembly {mscorlib, Version=2.0.5.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7cec85d7bea7798e} to C:Program Files (x86)Reference AssembliesMicrosoftFramework.NETFrameworkv4.5mscorlib.dll 2014-10-16 16:09:08,401 DEBUG SmartAssembly.AssemblyReader: Using {mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089} in preference to {mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089} [mscorlib]System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal::StructureToPtr System.Void(!!0, System.IntPtr, System.Boolean) The most likely cause is that SmartAssembly has used a different version of a dependency from the version used by EXAPTplus.Core.dll. If the details below are wrong, please use the MandatoryPath attribute in the .saproj file to ensure that the correct version of the dependency is found. Assembly that should contain the missing symbol: C:Program Files (x86)Reference AssembliesMicrosoftFramework.NETFrameworkv4.5mscorlib.dll SmartAssembly.InformationException: SmartAssembly has encountered an invalid symbol: [mscorlib]System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal::StructureToPtr System.Void(!!0, System.IntPtr, System.Boolean) The most likely cause is that SmartAssembly has used a different version of a dependency from the version used by EXAPTplus.Core.dll. If the details below are wrong, please use the MandatoryPath attribute in the .saproj file to ensure that the correct version of the dependency is found. Assembly that should contain the missing symbol: C:Program Files (x86)Reference AssembliesMicrosoftFramework.NETFrameworkv4.5mscorlib.dll In the .saproj: <Assembly AssemblyName="mscorlib, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" MandatoryPath="C:\Windows\Microsoft.Net\assembly\GAC_32\mscorlib\v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089\mscorlib.dll" > <Merging /> </Assembly> / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. StructureToPtr with dot net 4.5.1
I encountered the same problem. I upgraded from .NET 4.0 to .NET 4.5.2. Even with the MandatoryPath set, I can't get it to work. The reason is that some assembly is referring to .NET 2.0: 2014-10-1...
0 votes
After lots of updating and testing, I finally figured out the problem: The .NET 2.0 assembly used a different key to sign the assembly, so the MandatoryPath doesn't work. With the following change I get it to compile: <Assembly AssemblyName="mscorlib, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" MandatoryPath="C:\Windows\Microsoft.Net\assembly\GAC_32\mscorlib\v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089\mscorlib.dll" /> <Assembly AssemblyName="mscorlib, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7cec85d7bea7798e" MandatoryPath="C:\Windows\Microsoft.Net\assembly\GAC_32\mscorlib\v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089\mscorlib.dll" /> However, I now get the following warning: One or more of the merged assemblies uses internal members of unmerged assemblies via InternalsVisibleToAttribute. Your assembly may not work. However, so far I have not noticed any problems. / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. StructureToPtr with dot net 4.5.1
After lots of updating and testing, I finally figured out the problem: The .NET 2.0 assembly used a different key to sign the assembly, so the MandatoryPath doesn't work. With the following change ...
0 votes
If you are doing your own handling: There is a method SetProxy() on the UnhandledExceptionHandler. / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. Using WebProxy with Smart Assembly
If you are doing your own handling: There is a method SetProxy() on the UnhandledExceptionHandler.
0 votes
Total activity
34
Last activity
Member since
Following
0 users
Followed by
0 users
Votes
0
Subscriptions
14