Activity overview
Latest activity by williamw
I worked around this by creating separate assemblies for each of the two templates. / comments
I worked around this by creating separate assemblies for each of the two templates.
Chris: The other assemblies are being run through SmartAssembly. Do they also have to have the usage reporting option configured in SmartAssembly? What do you mean by "direct dependency"? They are directly referenced by the main executable assembly.
Daniel: Thanks for the information. That sounds like the way to go. In your SmartAssembly projects I assume you only turned on usage reporting for that one assembly, and not for the ones that are calling it to do reporting? / comments
Chris: The other assemblies are being run through SmartAssembly. Do they also have to have the usage reporting option configured in SmartAssembly? What do you mean by "direct dependency"? They are ...
Can't reference both SmartUsageCore and SmartExceptionCore
The SmartUsageCore assembly includes the SmartExceptionCore namespace so if I reference both I get several errors due to ambiguous names. Is it impossible to have a usage reporting template and an ...
Confusion about UsageCounter vs UsageReporter
The documentation examples for feature usage reporting use "UsageCounter.ReportUsage" to report feature usage.
The SDK templates define a class that inherits from UsageReporter and define static me...
Control when feature usage data is sent
It appears that feature usage data for an application is transmitted when the program terminates. I'm looking at using reporting from a service application that may run for months, and I'd like to ...
Feature usage reporting with multiple assemblies
I have an application that is built using several assemblies. Both the main executable and the assemblies contain features that I want to do usage reporting on. The assemblies are not being merged ...
Thanks--that's the piece I was missing. What is the best way to turn automatic reporting off or on programmatically after I get permission from the user during installation? Do I just build my own UnhandledExceptionHandler and UsageReporter classes that check for a saved setting, and point to those as the templates? / comments
Thanks--that's the piece I was missing. What is the best way to turn automatic reporting off or on programmatically after I get permission from the user during installation? Do I just build my own ...
Error reporting and feature usage from service application?
As far as I can tell SA does not support error reporting or feature usage reporting from services or console apps. Are there any plans to add this capability?