Comments
Sort by recent activity
Would you accept feedback from a person that does NOT use SQL Monitor much? Perhaps my lack of familiarity will allow me to think outside the box a bit. / comments
Would you accept feedback from a person that does NOT use SQL Monitor much? Perhaps my lack of familiarity will allow me to think outside the box a bit.
Oooh - I think I can make that work! Thanks for the suggestion! / comments
Oooh - I think I can make that work! Thanks for the suggestion!
I haz a sadz!!! I've been using Vault for umpteen years for umpteen clients' code control. So much for checking out the new version (at least until I get the time/inclination to migrate to another platform for SCC). [image]
"The following version control systems are no longer supported:
Vault Standard or Vault Professional" / comments
I haz a sadz!!! I've been using Vault for umpteen years for umpteen clients' code control. So much for checking out the new version (at least until I get the time/inclination to migrate to another ...
Yes, yes it IS good news!! Hopefully they don't get replaced with something else that is "good for the developers, but bad for users". :-D / comments
Yes, yes it IS good news!! Hopefully they don't get replaced with something else that is "good for the developers, but bad for users". :-D
Not sure if it comes into play, but could file zeroing be a thing here? Would Instant File Initialization be helpful if so?
Other than that, I would say it is VERY dependent on your IO read, network, IO write capabilities and latencies - which can each be a HUGE impediment to throughput. / comments
Not sure if it comes into play, but could file zeroing be a thing here? Would Instant File Initialization be helpful if so?
Other than that, I would say it is VERY dependent on your IO read, networ...
Ordering is probably not as useful as search honestly. But if you have hundreds or thousands of objects search would be REALLY helpful. And if you are going to allow search it should be 2-phase: i.e. you can restrict the search to object names or drop it down into the code of the differences. This is quite different from a browser search and I think adds to the usefulness. / comments
Ordering is probably not as useful as search honestly. But if you have hundreds or thousands of objects search would be REALLY helpful. And if you are going to allow search it should be 2-phase: i....
Another +1 on the filtering, and a very easy way to ignore (and not even report on at all perhaps) identical items).
I would also like to see some ability to order and search.
A future cool item would be something like GMail's hotkeys where you can move up and down with arrow keys, expand/collapse with a key stroke, etc. / comments
Another +1 on the filtering, and a very easy way to ignore (and not even report on at all perhaps) identical items).
I would also like to see some ability to order and search.
A future cool item wo...
You do not move the data multiple times when you use SQL Clone. One move to create the image (from a backup or directly from a live database). Then it is just "mounting" that image as a new read/write database on any SQL Server. Each time you do this it takes 10-15 seconds and ~50MB of local disk space.
Now, if you actually ACCESS data (say for tuning some query or running some report) then you move the data to the local box. Thus the network becomes much more important piece of the infrastructure pie (as does the storage you create the image on). / comments
You do not move the data multiple times when you use SQL Clone. One move to create the image (from a backup or directly from a live database). Then it is just "mounting" that image as a new read/wr...
I agree with Grant, but with a rather large caveat. The query plan you get is drastically influenced by the "server" capabilities. In the vast majority of cases the machine you mount a clone on will be a fraction of the hardware (especially the optimizer-affecting ones of CPU and RAM) that the production box is. So you could wind up chasing a red herring or worse. Another potential gotcha is the edition/version/build of SQL Server the clone is mounted on. / comments
I agree with Grant, but with a rather large caveat. The query plan you get is drastically influenced by the "server" capabilities. In the vast majority of cases the machine you mount a clone on wil...
That's a really nice list of enhancements Mark / comments
That's a really nice list of enhancements Mark