Comments
Sort by recent activity
sirflimflam wrote:
So I've known about the expiration deal for a while now and decided to give 7 a trial run and I've noticed one thing in particular.
Performance, responsiveness, and overall appearance of the program has gone completely down the tube! Is this a complete rewrite or something by entirely new people?
I'm not sure what you guys did, but you really mucked things up. It takes eons to decompile something which took mere moments previously. Input responsiveness has taken a hit. You added a lot of weird animations that seem entirely unnecessary (hovering over a tab).
I'm really not particularly pleased with the direction this product has taken from 6 to 7, and to be frank, it makes the added price appear to be a joke.
I know, right? / comments
sirflimflam wrote:
So I've known about the expiration deal for a while now and decided to give 7 a trial run and I've noticed one thing in particular.
Performance, responsiveness, and overall ap...
Also, to actually break Cecil's license, .NET Reflector would have to actually use Cecil. / comments
Also, to actually break Cecil's license, .NET Reflector would have to actually use Cecil.
mb wrote:
MulleDK19 wrote:
Also, to actually break Cecil's license, .NET Reflector would have to actually use Cecil.
Hmm - interesting (a little bit anyway). Reflector had the Cecil license file in its installation. I guess I just assumed that meant it used Cecil. In any case, I don't have a Reflector install at the moment, so I can't recheck (not that it really matters).
.NET Reflector only references log4net. Which it includes the license notice for (See log4net_LICENSE.txt). So that renders this topic invalid. / comments
mb wrote:
MulleDK19 wrote:
Also, to actually break Cecil's license, .NET Reflector would have to actually use Cecil.
Hmm - interesting (a little bit anyway). Reflector had the Cecil license...