How can we help you today? How can we help you today?
Knuddlbaer
Activity overview Badges (0) Posts (3) Comments (7)

Comments

Sort by recent activity
Let's build the project step by step: First, pls create C:\t\redgate_13136 directory so we have the same structure. Next, create an empty .Net 4.0 class library project named ClassLibrary1 Add this function: public class Class1 { public void Function() { Console.WriteLine("Hello World"); } } and use C:\t\redgate_13136\test.snk to sign the dll. Build the dll and copy the result to C:\t\redgate_13136 Next, Build an ConsoleApplication Project. Add a reference to C:\t\redgate_13136\ClassLibrary1.dll Add following code for Main: class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Class1 c1 = new Class1(); c1.Function(); Console.ReadLine(); } } Make shure, MDA is enabled: http://haispeed.de/redgate/MDA%20Message.jpg Run the sample in VS2010. There should no MDA Messages about pInvoke and stack. You find this step at http://www.haispeed.de/redgate/13136/Step1.zip Next, open smartassembly. Create new project. Browse for Assembly C:\t\redgate_13136\ClassLibrary1\ClassLibrary1\bin\Debug\ClassLibrary1.dll Set Target to C:\t\redgate_13136\ClassLibrary1.dll Change Strong Name Signing to "I want to sign my assembly with a strong name". Browse for an key and select C:\t\redgate_13136\test.snk Say: I want to add tamper protection http://haispeed.de/redgate/13136/SA_Setting.jpg All other otpions leave as is. Build the SA project and rebuild (full rebuild) the ConsoleApplication1. Start the app. There should now an MDA Message: http://haispeed.de/redgate/13136/MDA-Message.jpg Ein Aufruf an die PInvoke-Funktion "ClassLibrary1!ClassLibrary1.Class1::StrongNameSignatureVerificationEx" hat das Gleichgewicht des Stapels gestört. Wahrscheinlich stimmt die verwaltete PInvoke-Signatur nicht mit der nicht verwalteten Zielsignatur überein. Überprüfen Sie, ob die Aufrufkonvention und die Parameter der PInvoke-Signatur mit der nicht verwalteten Zielsignatur übereinstimmen. You find the Step on You find this step at http://www.haispeed.de/redgate/13136/Step2.zip Version of SmartAssembly is 6.0 buiild 513 / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. PInvokeStackImbalance on using tamper protection
Let's build the project step by step: First, pls create C:\t\redgate_13136 directory so we have the same structure. Next, create an empty .Net 4.0 class library project named ClassLibrary1 Add this...
0 votes
I was not able to reproduce this problem in an small project. I'll write here if i found my error or build an small example. Best regards Michael / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. PInvokeStackImbalance on using tamper protection
I was not able to reproduce this problem in an small project. I'll write here if i found my error or build an small example. Best regards Michael
0 votes
It happens only if i used tamper protection. I'm new to smartassembly, i don't know what tamperprotection changes. This problem will happen if you use an .Net 4.0 project. Steps to reproduce: Create an ConsoleApplication App and an DLl app. Create an function in the dll and sign it with strong keyname. Protect the dll with tamper protection. Use the class and function in console application. Start the project in Debugger with MDA Messages anabled. MDA Message: http://haispeed.de/redgate/MDA%20Message.jpg VS2010 Settings: http://haispeed.de/redgate/Settings%20for%20VS2010.jpg http://haispeed.de/redgate/Settings%20VS2010%202.jpg Testproject: http://haispeed.de/redgate/ConsoleApplication1.zip If you remove tamper protection, there is no MDA Message. Examplemessage without obfuscating: Ein Aufruf an die PInvoke-Funktion "Haispeed.Base2!Haispeed.Base2.FrameWorkHelper::StrongNameSignatureVerificationEx" Best regards Michael Roth / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. PInvokeStackImbalance on using tamper protection
It happens only if i used tamper protection. I'm new to smartassembly, i don't know what tamperprotection changes. This problem will happen if you use an .Net 4.0 project. Steps to reproduce: Creat...
0 votes
Is it possible to make an feature request for future versions? Best regards Michael / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. Keycontainer
Is it possible to make an feature request for future versions? Best regards Michael
0 votes
Using strong name with keycontainer like: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library ... 80%29.aspx and [assembly: AssemblyKeyName("<Keyname>")] http://snipplr.com/view/920/shared-stro ... container/ You can install an key in keycontainer using sn.exe -i . Than you can refer this key with [assembly: AssemblyKeyName("<Keyname>")] or compilerflag /keycontainer so you do not need to handle the file unsave on any drive or get the usb stick out of the securitybox. I build my framework with AssemblyKeyName and need to take my usb stick on obfuscating. It was nice, if i can use the key from keycontainer to like the c# compiler with /keycontainer. I'm sorry for my bad english. Best regards Michael / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. Keycontainer
Using strong name with keycontainer like:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library ... 80%29.aspx and [assembly: AssemblyKeyName("<Keyname>")]http://snipplr.com/view/920/shared-stro ... container/ Yo...
0 votes
[edit]Wrong window - sry[/edit] / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. Keycontainer
[edit]Wrong window - sry[/edit]
0 votes
Since i need to obfuscate more than one part at one time, i wrote some batch files and added the sign process on this files. best regards Michael / comments
  1. Community
  2. SmartAssembly
  3. Execute task after build
Since i need to obfuscate more than one part at one time, i wrote some batch files and added the sign process on this files. best regards Michael
0 votes
Total activity
13
Last activity
Member since
Following
0 users
Followed by
0 users
Votes
0
Subscriptions
3