Comments
Sort by recent activity
Thanks for the response / comments
Thanks for the response
Looks like if I remove IncludeDependencies option, the issue goes away. That's fine because we probably want to be explicit about deploying those anyway. I assume that makes this not a bug, because if I say include dependencies that's going to include the underlying PS and PF.
Thanks for looking into it. / comments
Looks like if I remove IncludeDependencies option, the issue goes away. That's fine because we probably want to be explicit about deploying those anyway. I assume that makes this not a bug, becau...
Thanks for the response! Look forward to hearing from you. / comments
Thanks for the response! Look forward to hearing from you.
And I can also confirm that if I do nothing else except add the IgnoreFileGroups option, the problem goes away.
However, because of the issue described here http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ... hp?t=14710
I can't use that option. (And these are Partition Schemes and Partition Functions, not Filegroups anyway [image] ) / comments
And I can also confirm that if I do nothing else except add the IgnoreFileGroups option, the problem goes away.
However, because of the issue described herehttp://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ....
Also, if I change something else like a stored proc, the Interactive HTML Report accurately reflects that as the only change. And it is also included as a change in the Output SQL. However the output SQL still includes the partition scheme synchronization that should be excluded by the filter. / comments
Also, if I change something else like a stored proc, the Interactive HTML Report accurately reflects that as the only change. And it is also included as a change in the Output SQL. However the ou...