Comments
Sort by recent activity
My fault: I thought it would expire in March, but it expires on 30th of May and will come up with a message then. / comments
My fault: I thought it would expire in March, but it expires on 30th of May and will come up with a message then.
There is a file called cecil_LICENSE.txt, but it is not stated for what exactly it applies. If Reflector.exe uses parts of software which make this license necessary, them I am allowed to deal in the Software without restriction [image] , which means:
- Maybe I cannot get the source code
- I may hack it and remove the time limitation
- I may redistribute the hacked version
I am not so sure whether other limitations from License_DotNetReflector.txt can be applied.
In chapter 4, Red-Gate tries to make it a non-transferrable license. This is in contrast to the Cecil license, which allows "publish, distribute, sublicense".
Actually it seems quite similar to GPL in terms of a viral license, except the availability of source code.
BTW: there seems to be no license for RedGate.Reflector.Addin.dll at all.
I think it's worth having a look at the license exactly at this point in time. / comments
There is a file called cecil_LICENSE.txt, but it is not stated for what exactly it applies. If Reflector.exe uses parts of software which make this license necessary, them I am allowed to deal in t...
:idea: We should ask Lutz to make his version open source if he did not sell it to RedGate. Maybe he still owns the initial creator rights and is able to do so.
This will bring us some years back, but that's not too bad. / comments
:idea: We should ask Lutz to make his version open source if he did not sell it to RedGate. Maybe he still owns the initial creator rights and is able to do so.
This will bring us some years back, ...
I vote for the open source idea. If Red Gate cannot come up for the cost, let SourceForge do it. / comments
I vote for the open source idea. If Red Gate cannot come up for the cost, let SourceForge do it.