Activity overview
Latest activity by sergiopereira
rhyatt wrote:
If Redgate can't support it as a free tool, they should turn it back over to the open source community who can successfully do it.
I sympathize with the idea, but I honestly doubt that the .NET community can keep something like Reflector alive for as long as Reflector has existed.
I know I'd happily pay for Reflector at $35 if I needed to but I know that's not viable for many developers I know, notably in other countries.
Right now I'm hoping MS wakes up to the importance of Reflector in .NET and realizes they have a severe gap in the SDK without Reflector. I hope they either acquire this software and include in the SDK or create something similar.
Redgate could get their investment back and the community would get their essential tool "back" as well.
In the end, my speculation is that the paid version of Reflector will not sustain the development of the tool. It will either become OSS or owned by MS... or it will disappear completely when C#5 arrives with new unsupported language features. / comments
rhyatt wrote:
If Redgate can't support it as a free tool, they should turn it back over to the open source community who can successfully do it.
I sympathize with the idea, but I honestly doub...