Comments
Sort by recent activity
Hi mySunSet,
You should be able to find all the information you need at www.Reflector.net. Please let us know if you have any questions via the new forum.
Greg / comments
Hi mySunSet,
You should be able to find all the information you need at www.Reflector.net. Please let us know if you have any questions via the new forum.
Greg
ckarras
Thanks for your suggestions and explaining your situation. We are already looking at something very similar to your suggestion that will make it easier to activate your license temporarily on other machines without having to worry about constantly managing the deactivation manually. I will continue to post updates as we have them here: http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ... hp?t=12702
I’d also like to reach out to you now in the same way we did for Ian above. Are you happy to discuss this via email? I am sure my colleague Hannah can get you set up with something that will work well for you right away. / comments
ckarras
Thanks for your suggestions and explaining your situation. We are already looking at something very similar to your suggestion that will make it easier to activate your license temporarily ...
Ian
Thanks for your reply Ian and my apologies for the delay in my response. Please see the first thread I posted to @all for more details on the way licensing will work. I can assure you that we will cover your situation as standard. As a thank you for starting this topic I’d be happy to work this out for you on a current license of .NET Reflector Pro for just $35. By purchasing .NET Reflector Pro now you’ll also get an upgrade to .NET Reflector VSPro free of charge and qualify for the 3 years extra support and upgrades we are giving away to all Reflector Pro customers at the time of the upgrade to V7. I’d be really happy to work this out with you via email if you like.
Thanks again for kicking of this topic here. / comments
Ian
Thanks for your reply Ian and my apologies for the delay in my response. Please see the first thread I posted to @all for more details on the way licensing will work. I can assure you that we w...
Gigiwig
Thanks for posting your feedback here and I hope we can come up with a solution that works for you as discussed in the thread I posted to @all above. For more information on pricing please also see the following thread: http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ... hp?t=12718
I do hope you will continue to consider SmartAssembly for your obfuscation needs. SmartAssembly really has revolutionised the way we develop software at Red Gate and with the new feature reporting functionality it just got even better! / comments
Gigiwig
Thanks for posting your feedback here and I hope we can come up with a solution that works for you as discussed in the thread I posted to @all above. For more information on pricing please ...
@All
I’ve just posted some more information on this topic on the following thread: http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ... hp?t=12702 / comments
@All
I’ve just posted some more information on this topic on the following thread:http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ... hp?t=12702
Ian, ckarras Thanks for your questions guys.
Reflector 7.0 will be licensed per user and not per machine but there is a limit on the number of activations each user has at any point in time. In the case of Reflector Pro this is currently 2 activations per user but you can request more by filling in a form on our website that is accessed from inside the tool. You can also deactivate and reactivate machines using our deactivation tool. We plan for the standard version of Reflector to work in the same way once we start charging for it.
More information can be found here: http://www.red-gate.com/supportcenter/L ... 0Reflector
I would be curious to know how many activations you think you would need so that licensing does not get in your way too often? / comments
Ian, ckarras Thanks for your questions guys.
Reflector 7.0 will be licensed per user and not per machine but there is a limit on the number of activations each user has at any point in time. In th...
gaearon , qstarin, sosiosh, JAssange, soundbender Thanks for your comments. gaearon I can see why you think the story looks this way. In the following video Simon (my boss and one of the two guys that own Red Gate) talks about some of our reasons for doing this. You can skip to (2:22) if you want to get to the reasons why we couldn’t make the free model work. You’ll also see that there are no ties at Red Gate except on the interviewees! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKnEjiSGZLA / comments
gaearon , qstarin, sosiosh, JAssange, soundbender Thanks for your comments.gaearon I can see why you think the story looks this way. In the following video Simon (my boss and one of the two guys t...
gaearon , qstarin Thanks for your comments. gaearon I can see why you think the story looks this way. In the following video Simon (my boss and one of the two guys that own Red Gate) talks about some of our reasons for doing this. You can skip to (2:22) if you want to get to the reasons why we couldn’t make the free model work. You’ll also see that there are no ties at Red Gate except on the interviewees! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKnEjiSGZLA / comments
gaearon , qstarin Thanks for your comments.gaearon I can see why you think the story looks this way. In the following video Simon (my boss and one of the two guys that own Red Gate) talks about so...
mlsomers i can also assure you that there is no conspiracy theory relating to SmartAssembly although you are right that there may be some cross over of users that would be interested in both products. / comments
mlsomers i can also assure you that there is no conspiracy theory relating to SmartAssembly although you are right that there may be some cross over of users that would be interested in both products.
mlsomers Thanks for your feedback. Are you an add-in author yourself? We have always viewed the add-in authors as a particularly special set of Reflector users. We tried to make an effort to get in touch with every single individual before the announcement to let them know about our plans and to find out how this would affect them. My apologies if we have missed you or any others that we were not aware of.
We have also been discussing how add-ins will fit into the future of Reflector with all of the authors. The sad thing is that less than 10% of current Reflector users even know add-ins exist. The current codeplex page feels a little unloved and there are some really great tools in there amongst the moribund stuff.
After speaking with all of the add-in authors that were interested in maintaining their code for the paid version of Reflector we have come up with the initial idea of a 'Recommended add-ins' page on a whole new Reflector website. You will see more news of this site over the following few weeks.
Again my apologies to any of the add-in authors that we were unaware of or unable to reach. / comments
mlsomers Thanks for your feedback. Are you an add-in author yourself? We have always viewed the add-in authors as a particularly special set of Reflector users. We tried to make an effort to get in...