Activity overview
Latest activity by dmasciangelo
I'm having the same problem PDinCA reported on the same server OS using SQL Monitor 3.4. When launching either SQLToolbelt.exe or SQLMonitor.exe to install I'm prompted with:
"Verification of SQL Toolbelt failed, Do you with to continue? Error is: 0x800b010a"
If I continue the installer gets nearly to the and crashes as PDinCA described.
I can't find any log files to send you... / comments
I'm having the same problem PDinCA reported on the same server OS using SQL Monitor 3.4. When launching either SQLToolbelt.exe or SQLMonitor.exe to install I'm prompted with:
"Verification of SQL ...
David Atkinson wrote:
Thanks for the request. This is a strong candidate for the next release (along with static data support).
I'm not familiar with tSQLt. Would this allow the unit test objects to be created in a separate linked database? This might be a workaround to avoid SQL Source Control from trying to commit them.
David
It is possible to place the tests in another database, but changing all my tests (which assume local db objects) would be tedious at best. / comments
David Atkinson wrote:
Thanks for the request. This is a strong candidate for the next release (along with static data support).
I'm not familiar with tSQLt. Would this allow the unit test object...
I agree with tscottIDG. We need to be able to ignore some database objects from source control. In my case I'm using tSQLt to create unit tests on database objects. I'm handling the units test separately in subversion and don't want them included as part of the databases source control but I can't ignore them... / comments
I agree with tscottIDG. We need to be able to ignore some database objects from source control. In my case I'm using tSQLt to create unit tests on database objects. I'm handling the units test ...