Comments
Sort by recent activity
Well kick me for not reading the release notes!
I'll post the rest of my feedback in the appropriate sticky threads. / comments
Well kick me for not reading the release notes!
I'll post the rest of my feedback in the appropriate sticky threads.
Sounds like you'd need to disable the SPACE and ENTER auto-completions in the options, and use another key to signify you want to accept what is highlighted, when you do want to do so. / comments
Sounds like you'd need to disable the SPACE and ENTER auto-completions in the options, and use another key to signify you want to accept what is highlighted, when you do want to do so.
I should be putting in here that at this point we're still 100% SQL 2000, so I'm using regular ol' QA version 8. / comments
I should be putting in here that at this point we're still 100% SQL 2000, so I'm using regular ol' QA version 8.
Brian/all,
I wanted to report that this patch cleared all errors that I had been receiving during the day for highly-loaded servers; I rolled this patch out to the busy servers yesterday, and haven't gotten a single failure since.
Thanks for the great support! / comments
Brian/all,
I wanted to report that this patch cleared all errors that I had been receiving during the day for highly-loaded servers; I rolled this patch out to the busy servers yesterday, and have...
The answer is definitely yes. / comments
The answer is definitely yes.
Yep, it's SQL 2000, and it's immediate, no delay whatsoever. / comments
Yep, it's SQL 2000, and it's immediate, no delay whatsoever.
My apologies, I just found out today that this is in fact a SQL 7.0 box... wasn't aware we still had any online! / comments
My apologies, I just found out today that this is in fact a SQL 7.0 box... wasn't aware we still had any online!
I have gotten a few patches, but I don't think I've gotten a patch that includes that... Can you forward that on to me? jmurrah AT gtl.net / comments
I have gotten a few patches, but I don't think I've gotten a patch that includes that... Can you forward that on to me? jmurrah AT gtl.net
I wanted to input that this is the primary failure/problem that I have with Red Gate SQL Backup, are the VDI 1010 errors. It doesn't take much load to cause this failure.
Is the next major revision going to have this timeout adjustable? @CPU_Busy, but I'd rather have Red Gate wait longer for the API.
Overall, thanks for the great product! / comments
I wanted to input that this is the primary failure/problem that I have with Red Gate SQL Backup, are the VDI 1010 errors. It doesn't take much load to cause this failure.
Is the next major revisio...
I'm getting this same exact intermittent error; I'm running 3.2.0.1 to fix the GMT ERASEFILE bug... does 3.2.0.2 reduce/eliminate this problem? It seems to be a load problem, I usually get it when multiple backups or multiple log backups are happening at once. Here's an example from the logs:
Thanks!
-Josh Murrah 8/17/2005 1:58:38 PM: SQL Backup 3.2.0, (c) Red Gate Software Ltd 2004 - 2005
8/17/2005 1:58:38 PM:
8/17/2005 1:58:38 PM: Backing up SiteCount (full database) to X:\BACKUP\CORP-RSERVER_SiteCount_FULL_200508171358.sqb ...
8/17/2005 1:58:38 PM:
8/17/2005 1:58:38 PM: BACKUP DATABASE [SiteCount] TO DISK = 'X:\BACKUP\CORP-RSERVER_SiteCount_FULL_200508171358.sqb' WITH NAME = '', DESCRIPTION = '', ERASEFILES = 1, COMPRESSION = 1
8/17/2005 1:58:38 PM:
8/17/2005 1:58:38 PM:
8/17/2005 1:58:53 PM: VDI error 1010: Failed to get configuration from server. Check that the SQL Server instance is running, and that you have the SQL Server Systems Administrator server role. Error code: -2139684861 (The api was waiting and the timeout interval had elapsed.)
/ comments
I'm getting this same exact intermittent error; I'm running 3.2.0.1 to fix the GMT ERASEFILE bug... does 3.2.0.2 reduce/eliminate this problem? It seems to be a load problem, I usually get it when...