Comments
Sort by recent activity
When I view the table sql in pl/sql developer I see the same script so for me the two tables are identical. I think CHAR_USED being different it's caused by server configuration differences so I want to ignore it. I found 'show parameter NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS' command but I can't execute it on the production server. I think that the tool should either ignore differences if NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS reports different result or have an option to ignore it manually. / comments
When I view the table sql in pl/sql developer I see the same script so for me the two tables are identical. I think CHAR_USED being different it's caused by server configuration differences so I wa...
You are right but why does PL/SQL developer show the same script on both servers? / comments
You are right but why does PL/SQL developer show the same script on both servers?
Just sent it to support email. / comments
Just sent it to support email.
Screenshot of what? / comments
Screenshot of what?
I checked version and it's the same: 11.2.0.3.0
I tried comparing it myself with all_tab_cols and found this:
CHAR_USED - production has B, local C. DATA_LENGTH - production has 1, local 4.
PL/SQL developer shows VARCHAR2(1) in both cases. Can this be caused by server configuration? / comments
I checked version and it's the same: 11.2.0.3.0
I tried comparing it myself with all_tab_cols and found this:
CHAR_USED - production has B, local C. DATA_LENGTH - production has 1, local 4.
PL/SQL ...
So can we have an option to ignore CHAR_USED ? / comments
So can we have an option to ignore CHAR_USED ?
What details do you need apart from table schema definition? / comments
What details do you need apart from table schema definition?
News fro jetbrains: http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/02/resharper-6-bundles-decompiler-free-standalone-tool-to-follow/ / comments
News fro jetbrains: http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/02/resharper-6-bundles-decompiler-free-standalone-tool-to-follow/
So far, your only response to this has been, "Lutz done it! It's not our fault! Buy v7 and it won't ever expire, honest guv!" You have completely ignored the huge difference between forcing users of a free program to upgrade to the latest free version, and forcing users of a free program to upgrade to a paid-for version. What you are doing here can only be compared to extortion.
I completely agree. The fact that Lutz put the time bomb does not mean that you can't or shouldn't remove it when you releasing a new paid version. You just do not want to remove it and are blaming Lutz for it. He was not selling the product but you changed that. Why don't you make another change and remove the time bomb?
Anyway, a new decompiler is being developed by Mono.Cecil author so I believe it will be enough for developers so that they will not have to by it from you. / comments
So far, your only response to this has been, "Lutz done it! It's not our fault! Buy v7 and it won't ever expire, honest guv!" You have completely ignored the huge difference between forcing use...
In my opinion redgate should at least remove the time bomb from current version. They should also release source code so that it can be maintained by the community.
Otherwise it will be just a matter of time before a cracked version or patch is released. / comments
In my opinion redgate should at least remove the time bomb from current version. They should also release source code so that it can be maintained by the community.
Otherwise it will be just a matt...