How can we help you today? How can we help you today?
mcnamaragio
Activity overview Badges (0) Posts (3) Comments (22)

Comments

Sort by recent activity
Just sent it to support email. / comments
  1. Community
  2. Schema Compare for Oracle
  3. Char detected as byte on production server.
Just sent it to support email.
0 votes
Screenshot of what? / comments
  1. Community
  2. Schema Compare for Oracle
  3. Char detected as byte on production server.
Screenshot of what?
0 votes
I checked version and it's the same: 11.2.0.3.0 I tried comparing it myself with all_tab_cols and found this: CHAR_USED - production has B, local C. DATA_LENGTH - production has 1, local 4. PL/SQL developer shows VARCHAR2(1) in both cases. Can this be caused by server configuration? / comments
  1. Community
  2. Schema Compare for Oracle
  3. Char detected as byte on production server.
I checked version and it's the same: 11.2.0.3.0 I tried comparing it myself with all_tab_cols and found this: CHAR_USED - production has B, local C. DATA_LENGTH - production has 1, local 4. PL/SQL ...
0 votes
So can we have an option to ignore CHAR_USED ? / comments
  1. Community
  2. Schema Compare for Oracle
  3. Char detected as byte on production server.
So can we have an option to ignore CHAR_USED ?
0 votes
What details do you need apart from table schema definition? / comments
  1. Community
  2. Schema Compare for Oracle
  3. Char detected as byte on production server.
What details do you need apart from table schema definition?
0 votes
News fro jetbrains: http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/02/resharper-6-bundles-decompiler-free-standalone-tool-to-follow/ / comments
  1. Community
  2. .NET Reflector 7.0 Feedback
  3. JetBrains providing an alternative?
News fro jetbrains: http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/02/resharper-6-bundles-decompiler-free-standalone-tool-to-follow/
0 votes
So far, your only response to this has been, "Lutz done it! It's not our fault! Buy v7 and it won't ever expire, honest guv!" You have completely ignored the huge difference between forcing users of a free program to upgrade to the latest free version, and forcing users of a free program to upgrade to a paid-for version. What you are doing here can only be compared to extortion. I completely agree. The fact that Lutz put the time bomb does not mean that you can't or shouldn't remove it when you releasing a new paid version. You just do not want to remove it and are blaming Lutz for it. He was not selling the product but you changed that. Why don't you make another change and remove the time bomb? Anyway, a new decompiler is being developed by Mono.Cecil author so I believe it will be enough for developers so that they will not have to by it from you. / comments
  1. Community
  2. .NET Reflector 7.0 Feedback
  3. Redgate should turn over .Net Reflector back to open source
So far, your only response to this has been, "Lutz done it! It's not our fault! Buy v7 and it won't ever expire, honest guv!" You have completely ignored the huge difference between forcing use...
0 votes
In my opinion redgate should at least remove the time bomb from current version. They should also release source code so that it can be maintained by the community. Otherwise it will be just a matter of time before a cracked version or patch is released. / comments
  1. Community
  2. .NET Reflector 7.0 Feedback
  3. Redgate should turn over .Net Reflector back to open source
In my opinion redgate should at least remove the time bomb from current version. They should also release source code so that it can be maintained by the community. Otherwise it will be just a matt...
0 votes
It would be nice if the static data support is added to the product. Also, it would be nice if it was possible to choose which part of the static data should go under source control. For example, Data that comes with default installation of my program should be source controled but the data that developer inserts through the program to check his work should not. Basically, if the data is inserted/updated/deleted from ssms then it should be in source control otherwise it should not. It would be nice if you included similar feature in the program. / comments
  1. Community
  2. SQL Source Control Previous Versions
  3. Linking the static data with SQL Source Control
It would be nice if the static data support is added to the product. Also, it would be nice if it was possible to choose which part of the static data should go under source control. For example, D...
0 votes
I guess I didn't explain it well. There is two kinds of static data in the database: 1. The static part of the data that comes with the installation and cannot be edited/added/deleted by the user. This should be in source control. If the developer makes changes to the data with ssms it should be reflected in source control. It can be solved with sql data compare as it is possible to limit what to synchronize 2. Preconfigured values that can be changed. For example default data for a dropdownbox. The user can add/edit/delete data from the program. This should be in source control. However when a developer modifies some data to it through the program it shouldn't go in source control. A possible solution can be to have a isdefault column which distinguishes between default and user data. The problem with this approach is that if preconfigured record is modified or deleted from the program (so isdefault is true) it should not be changed in the source control. Thanks. / comments
  1. Community
  2. SQL Source Control Previous Versions
  3. Linking the static data with SQL Source Control
I guess I didn't explain it well. There is two kinds of static data in the database: 1. The static part of the data that comes with the installation and cannot be edited/added/deleted by the user. ...
0 votes
Total activity
29
Last activity
Member since
Following
0 users
Followed by
0 users
Votes
0
Subscriptions
4