Comments
Sort by recent activity
We are considering moving to TFS 2010, once I can get my DBA to open up permission for it! lol
I will keep track of SA changes in the future, I still will be using it for obfuscation, however the error reporting will need to wait till its more dynamic with our system. / comments
We are considering moving to TFS 2010, once I can get my DBA to open up permission for it! lol
I will keep track of SA changes in the future, I still will be using it for obfuscation, however the e...
That will be a showstopper for our applications due to our process flow.
Builds are compiled on our developer machines, each compile is sent to testing, then to staging, then to production.
(We currently only have 1 copy due to cost, so I'm only developer using this and I'm still pushing our administration to use a build server so we can use dev licenses, but we are limited due to our source control (Vault), which doesn't support many build servers that I've found)
So we would need a single web server, which is unlikely possible to be approved.
The reason for this is, each compile may or may not have bug fixes, can't 100% guarantee that what compile will not fail testing.
I will just wait to see if you guys implement a way to dynamically set the URL. / comments
That will be a showstopper for our applications due to our process flow.
Builds are compiled on our developer machines, each compile is sent to testing, then to staging, then to production.
(We cur...
We use Vault as well, in order for us to be able to use this, would require Vault implementation.
It would be very difficult to justify this if we have to use 2 seperate source control programs. / comments
We use Vault as well, in order for us to be able to use this, would require Vault implementation.
It would be very difficult to justify this if we have to use 2 seperate source control programs.