Comments
Sort by recent activity
Just to interject, but would this not be a good case for some sort of replication as well? / comments
Just to interject, but would this not be a good case for some sort of replication as well?
I deleted 12K+ of the log files and now it runs much faster. Is there ever going to be an option to delete older log files like the erase files option? / comments
I deleted 12K+ of the log files and now it runs much faster. Is there ever going to be an option to delete older log files like the erase files option?
Yes these are the timestamps as recorded on the remote machines. I did sync times on the two machines just before executing the backups to ensure that we were working off a common clock. I will be running without the logto option shortly. / comments
Yes these are the timestamps as recorded on the remote machines. I did sync times on the two machines just before executing the backups to ensure that we were working off a common clock. I will be ...
No significant change in backup time without the logto option. One thing I have seen while manualy running them is I get the following rowcounts back after the backup log successfull message...
1 row effected
9 rows affected
12829 rows affected (This number keeps increasing) / comments
No significant change in backup time without the logto option. One thing I have seen while manualy running them is I get the following rowcounts back after the backup log successfull message...
1 r...
In my case I am seeing approx a 2 minute difference between the log reported time and the actual amount of time. My currently group of regular transaction log backups is taking 20-25 minutes using SQLBackup while native it is in the 2-5 minute range.
What is the next step for correcting this? / comments
In my case I am seeing approx a 2 minute difference between the log reported time and the actual amount of time. My currently group of regular transaction log backups is taking 20-25 minutes using ...