Comments
Sort by recent activity
Good morning
Thanks. To try to clarify what I am attempting to do:
1) I am looking to establish a source control system - not only no dev environment but no source control either.
One reason for this is to overcome the problem of senior management "modifying" code in the DB without reference to other users or security or data integrity etc. Changing their access is not an option, so enforcing some Source Control may slow them down. I would hope it gives the option of replacing the code in the DB with what is in source Control.
2) It is possible that other developers within the organisation may choose to modify some code and they may use Visual Studio for this rather than Management Studio.
I was trying to see what the results were when this occurred. I found I could check out edit save checkin/commit etc from VS but I could not "deploy" those changes to the DB. When clicking the Get Latest button to update the DB I received advice that there was nothing to Update. It appeared as though the DB was held to be the source of all truth and while I could see the differences between the 2 files I only had the option to Commit the DB version rather than get the latest version.
Does that make it any clearer?
And the good news is I might be closer to getting a dev system now! / comments
Good morning
Thanks. To try to clarify what I am attempting to do:
1) I am looking to establish a source control system - not only no dev environment but no source control either.
One reason for t...