Comments
Sort by recent activity
The new installer is much better. [image]
However, the "Welcome to" popup when launching the new version now displays a "mixed content" warning: [image] / comments
The new installer is much better.
However, the "Welcome to" popup when launching the new version now displays a "mixed content" warning:
That option isn't available when you install the 9.2 update from the "Check for updates" option in the desktop application.
The only option is to specify the directories where the application and the extension will be installed. The installer then insists that "devenv" must be closed before it can continue. / comments
That option isn't available when you install the 9.2 update from the "Check for updates" option in the desktop application.
The only option is to specify the directories where the application and t...
What's happened to the option to not install the Visual Studio extension? I only want the desktop application, but I can't install the update unless I close Visual Studio. / comments
What's happened to the option to not install the Visual Studio extension? I only want the desktop application, but I can't install the update unless I close Visual Studio.
I get the same exception looking at the GetUrl method of the System.Web.UI.CompositeScriptReference class in the System.Web.Extensions assembly from .NET 3.5 SP1:
System.InvalidOperationException
InnerException:
Block statement count of zero during condition expression translation.
System.InvalidOperationException
at ឺ.ᜆ(Int32 A_0)
at ឺ.ᜋ(Int32 A_0)
at ឺ.ᜂ(Int32 A_0, Int32 A_1)
at ឺ.ᜍ()
at ឺ.ᜉ(Int32 A_0)
at ឺ.ᜋ(Int32 A_0)
at ឺ.ᜂ(Int32 A_0, Int32 A_1)
at ឺ.ᜀ(IExceptionHandler A_0)
at ឺ.ᜂ(Int32 A_0, Int32 A_1)
at ឺ.ᜀ(IMethodDeclaration A_0, IMethodBody A_1)
at ឤ.ᜀ(IMethodDeclaration A_0)
at ឥ.ᜁ(IMethodDeclaration A_0)
at ᝎ.ᜀ(Boolean A_0, Boolean A_1, Boolean A_2) / comments
I get the same exception looking at the GetUrl method of the System.Web.UI.CompositeScriptReference class in the System.Web.Extensions assembly from .NET 3.5 SP1:
System.InvalidOperationException
I...
Parallel.ForEach(information, async assemblyFileInfo =>
Passing an async delegate to Parallel.ForEach won't work as expected. The delegate you pass in will be turned into an async void method, which means the ForEach method can return before the delegate has completed, and exceptions thrown from the delegate won't be handled properly.
Stephen Toub wrote a ForEachAsync method on his blog back in 2012 which would work better: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pfxteam/archive/2012/03/05/10278165.aspx
Alternatively, use TPL Dataflow: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh228603.aspx / comments
Parallel.ForEach(information, async assemblyFileInfo =>
Passing an async delegate to Parallel.ForEach won't work as expected. The delegate you pass in will be turned into an async void method, ...
Nooooooo! That's a horrible idea! :x
Installer:
1. Launch the installer;
2. Wade through dozens of pointless screens (welcome, license agreement, installation folder, "are you sure you want to install?", etc.)
3. Acknowledge UAC prompt (Vista);
4. Wait for the installer to copy the files to the installation folder, copy the files to the installer cache, update the registry, etc.
5. Launch the program;
Zip file:
1. Extract the files;
2. Launch the program;
If you feel that you have to offer an installer, you should keep the zip file option as well. / comments
Nooooooo! That's a horrible idea! :x
Installer:
1. Launch the installer;
2. Wade through dozens of pointless screens (welcome, license agreement, installation folder, "are you sure you want to ins...
Still not working. Any news on the fix? / comments
Still not working. Any news on the fix?
jessica.ramos wrote:
We're aware of the issue and should hopefully have it resolved soon.
28 days later, and the update service is still broken.
Any idea what definition of "soon" you're using? / comments
jessica.ramos wrote:
We're aware of the issue and should hopefully have it resolved soon.
28 days later, and the update service is still broken.
Any idea what definition of "soon" you're using?
It's been reported, and they're working on it: http://forums.reflector.net/questions/589/startup-time / comments
It's been reported, and they're working on it:http://forums.reflector.net/questions/589/startup-time
cege7480 wrote:
It's not the same work. It's new work.
You've missed the point - I don't have a problem with Red Gate charging for Reflector v7.
What I did have a problem with was the announcement that all existing copies of v6 would expire, with the only option being to pay for an upgrade to v7.
Thankfully, that decision was at least partially revoked a few weeks ago. / comments
cege7480 wrote:
It's not the same work. It's new work.
You've missed the point - I don't have a problem with Red Gate charging for Reflector v7.
What I did have a problem with was the announce...