Activity overview
Latest activity by jvlake
Bart Read wrote:
It's possible none of the above would matter if Mono were in relatively widespread use throughout the Reflector community, Bart
I suppose you have good methods to measure this claim?
Anyway, Thanks for the reply.
So why can't Red Gate offer an old version that never times out (for mono users.)
Why are you one of the only companies that doesn't offer access to older versions of your software?
You have to understand why the community feels a bit shafted, given that even Lutz said Red Gate will continue to provide the free community version and is looking for your feedback and ideas for future versions. / comments
Bart Read wrote:
It's possible none of the above would matter if Mono were in relatively widespread use throughout the Reflector community, Bart
I suppose you have good methods to measure this...
gaearon wrote:
Who cares now?
Reflector is stolen from community.
Well it has to be said that I care quite a bit, it'd be good to see Redgate formally drop support, or offer some kind of lip service as to why something that fundamentally still would work except for Red gates own tinkering and obfuscation is now out of the hands of a sizable community.
I think mono support on Linux is a much better bet that support for oxygene.net dasm(IL).
Has to be said the one time I purchased a Redgate tool (SQL refactor) it worked fairly well although, no further releases, no feature enhancements. I doubt I'll ever return to make another purchase. Also noting it had a completely mental license where you had to unlicense your software before doing a computer rebuild or you could never reactivate it.
Just goes to show that Redgate cash the enterprise cheque and don't give a damn about the average developer. They should stay away from developer tools and stick to what they do best, making apparel (SQL toolbelts) / comments
gaearon wrote:
Who cares now?
Reflector is stolen from community.
Well it has to be said that I care quite a bit, it'd be good to see Redgate formally drop support, or offer some kind of lip s...
Alex.Davies wrote:
Reflector 6.5 should be compatible with Mono [image]
Unstickying
"should be", but isn't :
mono 2.8.1 exits with WARNING: The runtime version supported by this application is unavailable. Using default runtime: v2.0.50727
Where is a link to the old version 5.1.7? / comments
Alex.Davies wrote:
Reflector 6.5 should be compatible with Mono
Unstickying
"should be", but isn't :
mono 2.8.1 exits with WARNING: The runtime version supported by this application is unavai...
Mono support!
Does not seem to work with mono.
Reflector once upon a time (5.1.x) worked on Linux, I suppose with the monetization of this software it's not really surprising that support for Open Source archite...