Activity overview
Latest activity by joplus
james.billings wrote:
Sure - if you can, please mail support@red-gate.com with F0048275 in the subject line and I'll sort out the details with you.
Thanks, I've sent you an email. / comments
james.billings wrote:
Sure - if you can, please mail support@red-gate.com with F0048275 in the subject line and I'll sort out the details with you.
Thanks, I've sent you an email.
james.billings wrote:
Well according to the bug I found, the problem was actually fixed in 1.1... so either it got re-broken in a newer version, or what you are experiencing is caused by something else.
Is it possible for you to supply the database to us for further testing?
Let me check with my manager and I will get back with you shortly. Thanks again. / comments
james.billings wrote:
Well according to the bug I found, the problem was actually fixed in 1.1... so either it got re-broken in a newer version, or what you are experiencing is caused by somethi...
james.billings wrote:
Which version are you running? I found reference to a bug that caused this behaviour, which the patch from http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ... hp?t=11835 should help with.
I'm running 1.2.0.286, which is a lower version than the patch you mention (thanks, btw). But my database is case-sensitive, so I'm not sure this patch will help. And since the disclaimer says "Note: This patch has not completed the full release test cycle, so no guarantees are expressed or implied." I'm even more wary. Have you installed this update? Did it break anything? / comments
james.billings wrote:
Which version are you running? I found reference to a bug that caused this behaviour, which the patch from http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/vi ... hp?t=11835 should hel...
generic SQL Statement generator returning NULLs
I am using the "generic SQL Statement" generator to populate a column. The statement is something likeselect school_id from school_profile where district_id = 44
which should return 10 distinct val...
We experience problems with this quite a bit, since we have linked servers all over the place.
In our case, we have non-DBAs generating the build scripts, so I would prefer an option to exclude *just* the code with 4-part naming convention from synch scripts. Ideally, the excluded objects would appear in a list so that non-transactional synch scripts could be generated for them separately. / comments
We experience problems with this quite a bit, since we have linked servers all over the place.
In our case, we have non-DBAs generating the build scripts, so I would prefer an option to exclude *ju...