Comments
Sort by recent activity
Seems to work. I've changed the parm in the job. Will see if that eliminates the 'error' messages. / comments
Seems to work. I've changed the parm in the job. Will see if that eliminates the 'error' messages.
6.4.0.56 / comments
6.4.0.56
I agree with the request; surely there is an object you could use that equates to the functionality of the multi-select drop down list in excel tables?
Default is select all, but when you expand the list each entry in the list has a check box so you can select specific, but multiple items in the ddl.
Randy / comments
I agree with the request; surely there is an object you could use that equates to the functionality of the multi-select drop down list in excel tables?
Default is select all, but when you expand th...
Chris -
Yes, I know; you've already put the effort in. I understand.
I hope careful thought will go into what was lost in this re-design.
Don't get me wrong, there is a place for web based design, but the simplicity and elegance that was present in the winforms client is now almost completely lost.
The idea of a monitor is to provide the most insight possible 'at a glance'.
The click to drilll on alerts removes this. For instance in Version 1 I can simply expand all 4 of my servers and view the alerts all on one page; without the need to bounce back and forth. Also the font settings and other things in version 2 chews up a lot of screen; there is just too many things to go into now; but if you'd like I'll be happy to create a list over the next few weeks and post as a 'next design phase' request here.
Cheers / comments
Chris -
Yes, I know; you've already put the effort in. I understand.
I hope careful thought will go into what was lost in this re-design.
Don't get me wrong, there is a place for web based design,...
As to my comments about version 2; the reason I am opposed to the design choice is that the idea that I need a web based client to access when I roam is specious.
I can have a VPN setup with my network administrator; connect to my office computer through that VPN, and access a windows client such as version 1, no problem.
Thinking that way would have provided your engineers with the ability to avoid the common pitfalls of web browser, click crazy, interface considerations. / comments
As to my comments about version 2; the reason I am opposed to the design choice is that the idea that I need a web based client to access when I roam is specious.
I can have a VPN setup with my net...
My recommendation to all is use the XSP web server; it just works. / comments
My recommendation to all is use the XSP web server; it just works.
Well, it is my fault. I've become used to a certain simplicity in Red Gate tools setup, so I blew through the screen with a 'fast read'; should have read slower.
That said, 'xps' doesn't really say much. You might consider a terse explanation about it NOT being IIS, but a different option.
Also, I'm sure there were reasons why you went with this design, but having had it installed now for 24 hours, and struggling with it, I have to say I most definitely do not like it at all. Version 1 was 'everything' at a glance, that I needed to know.
The problem with a web browser is it pretty much forces you to always be cliking through to another page and that stinks when the purpose is to monitor.
Just my opinion, but hey, I'm a user, so I guess you'd want my feedback. :lol: / comments
Well, it is my fault. I've become used to a certain simplicity in Red Gate tools setup, so I blew through the screen with a 'fast read'; should have read slower.
That said, 'xps' doesn't really sa...
APOLOGIES - I need new glasses; I didn't see the 'xsp' option; Am unintalling and re-installing using that option instead.
So, disregard my Why IIS rant; apparently you all are smarter than most people who develop products requiring a web service and just assume IIS will work for them. / comments
APOLOGIES - I need new glasses; I didn't see the 'xsp' option; Am unintalling and re-installing using that option instead.
So, disregard my Why IIS rant; apparently you all are smarter than most pe...
We found the problem; was not on backup; new backup server - permissions on the folder were not set properly. / comments
We found the problem; was not on backup; new backup server - permissions on the folder were not set properly.
Oh, and I ran the statement below on the server...
exec master..sqbdata 'DELETE FROM backupfiles_copylist WHERE status <> ''S ''' / comments
Oh, and I ran the statement below on the server...
exec master..sqbdata 'DELETE FROM backupfiles_copylist WHERE status <> ''S '''