Comments
Sort by recent activity
That sounds the same as the problem above. The bug report SB-5388 was logged for it and should be fixed in the next update. / comments
That sounds the same as the problem above. The bug report SB-5388 was logged for it and should be fixed in the next update.
Sorry for the delay.
I've confirmed this as a bug with the current and previous versions, and case SB-5388 has been raised for it. This will be fixed and available in the next update.
If you can't wait for the next update, then we might be able to send you a private patch. / comments
Sorry for the delay.
I've confirmed this as a bug with the current and previous versions, and case SB-5388 has been raised for it. This will be fixed and available in the next update.
If you can't...
This doesn't appear to work in v7 either. The help file seems think the syntax should be supported, so I'll see what's up. / comments
This doesn't appear to work in v7 either. The help file seems think the syntax should be supported, so I'll see what's up.
It's normally the number of columns in a database that cause this sort of behaviour. Can you run the following and let me know the result:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sys.syscolumns AS S
Can you also run:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sys.sysobjects AS S / comments
It's normally the number of columns in a database that cause this sort of behaviour. Can you run the following and let me know the result:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sys.syscolumns AS S
Can you also run:...
Thanks for your post.
Which exact version of SQL Prompt are you using? I believe a recent update had some code added that would stop registering objects if it was going to cause it to run out of memory.
What happens after you unload the databases? Is this a performance issue, or does it mean you can't use any of the refactoring functionality? / comments
Thanks for your post.
Which exact version of SQL Prompt are you using? I believe a recent update had some code added that would stop registering objects if it was going to cause it to run out of me...
What does the file look like in Team Explorer? Are there any 'Pending Changes' to check in? SQL Source Control will only see the checked in files. / comments
What does the file look like in Team Explorer? Are there any 'Pending Changes' to check in? SQL Source Control will only see the checked in files.
What's the process for adding the object outside of SQL Source Control?
Is the file being directly added to TFS, or is it added to the shared database first and then added to TFS manually?
I don't think the shared model will check what's already in TFS as a shared database will always be on the latest version.
If the object is added to the shared database first and then added to TFS then I would think it *shouldn't* show the item as new.
I can test it out if that isn't the case. / comments
What's the process for adding the object outside of SQL Source Control?
Is the file being directly added to TFS, or is it added to the shared database first and then added to TFS manually?
I don't ...
That doesn't sound right.
What happens if you try to commit the object that's already been added to TFS? Does the blue indicator go away, or does it throw an error? / comments
That doesn't sound right.
What happens if you try to commit the object that's already been added to TFS? Does the blue indicator go away, or does it throw an error?
Thanks for your post.
Are you using the shared or the dedicated development model with SQL Source Control?
If you're using the shared model then there isn't really a concept of 'get latest' as the database will always be up-to-date.
If you're using the dedicated model, then if the files are committed to the same TFS repository, then a 'get latest' should pull them down. / comments
Thanks for your post.
Are you using the shared or the dedicated development model with SQL Source Control?
If you're using the shared model then there isn't really a concept of 'get latest' as the ...
Sorry for the delay, I've been on holiday.
I can confirm that if you supply ? as a value for a parameter, the 'Format SQL' causes SSMS to crash.
I've logged bug SP-4489 for our developers to take a look at.
Thanks for finding the cause of the problem for us. / comments
Sorry for the delay, I've been on holiday.
I can confirm that if you supply ? as a value for a parameter, the 'Format SQL' causes SSMS to crash.
I've logged bug SP-4489 for our developers to take a...